-
A third measure almost made the ballot, but the proposed constitutional amendment to require proof of citizenship when registering to vote will not appear
-
Justices with the U.S. and Michigan supreme courts both decided against the measure Thursday
-
The campaign is asking the U.S. Supreme Court for emergency intervention
-
The accuracy of the qualified voter file has been a major focus for some who accuse the Michigan Secretary of State of being slow to clean files
-
The Michigan Supreme Court will now decide whether a proposed state constitutional amendment to tighten the state’s voter ID laws belongs on the ballot
-
The measure only skips voters and becomes law if the Senate also passes it. Senate Majority Leader Brinks is already saying she won’t do so
-
A proposed state constitutional amendment to tighten Michigan’s voter ID laws barely missed a chance to make it before voters at a state elections board meeting today Monday
-
A campaign to tighten Michigan’s voter ID and registration policies has hit a roadblock on its path to the November ballot
-
Barring state lawmakers deciding to pass the measure into law themselves, the question will appear before voters this November
-
The proposed structure includes around 240 parking spaces