-
James and Jennifer Crumbley are challenging their involuntary manslaughter convictions on the grounds that the prosecution never revealed agreements made with key witnesses
-
Jennifer Crumbley’s attorney argues that the prosecution violated discovery rules
-
The appeals court panel issued an order denying the shooter’s claims for “lack of merit”
-
James Crumbley’s attorney argued in court Friday that the guilty verdict against her client is tainted
-
Lawyers for Jennifer Crumbley say her trial was spoiled by the prosecutor’s failure to disclose details about two major witnesses
-
An attorney for the mother of the Oxford High School shooter is accusing prosecutors of using taxpayer money to tarnish her client’s reputation and ignoring a pre-trial gag order
-
Ethan Crumbley’s appellate lawyers cited his mental health and other factors when he waived his right to trial and pleaded guilty to killing four students at Oxford High School in 2021
-
The motion argues the charges should be dropped altogether or Jennifer Crumbley should get a new trial
-
Ethan Crumbley's defense attorneys argue life without parole is too harsh a sentence, citing a troubled home life
-
The State Appellate Defender Office filed a motion Friday claiming “new and compelling evidence” that a life-without-parole sentence for the teenager was not justified