-
Right to Life of Michigan and the Pregnancy Resource Center says recent changes to the law require them to hire people regardless of their beliefs on reproductive rights
-
The reproductive rights amendment appeared on the state’s 2022 ballot as Proposal Three
-
Nessel said the screening requirement for abortion care is inconsistent with consent requirements in Michigan for other medical procedures
-
Judge Sima Patel says the laws are unconstitutional violations of the voter-approved reproductive rights amendment to the state constitution
-
Michigan joins the vast majority of U.S. states in allowing compensated surrogacy contracts
-
The Michigan Supreme Court will hear arguments next month over who gets custody of a frozen embryo following a couple’s divorce
-
Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed bills this week expanding reproductive health care in Michigan
-
The Michigan Senate voted this week to ban the sale of reproductive health data without gaining specific consent first
-
Judge Sima Patel wrote an opinion that declared laws including 24-hour waiting periods and a ban on certain licensed professionals dispensing abortion drugs likely violate the reproductive rights amendment adopted by voters in 2022
-
Abortion rights advocates say it’s the number one concern of voters. Pro-life supporters call that a scare tactic because the issue has already been decided in Michigan