- 
                        The reproductive rights amendment appeared on the state’s 2022 ballot as Proposal Three
- 
                        Nessel said the screening requirement for abortion care is inconsistent with consent requirements in Michigan for other medical procedures
- 
                        Judge Sima Patel says the laws are unconstitutional violations of the voter-approved reproductive rights amendment to the state constitution
- 
                        Michigan joins the vast majority of U.S. states in allowing compensated surrogacy contracts
- 
                        The Michigan Supreme Court will hear arguments next month over who gets custody of a frozen embryo following a couple’s divorce
- 
                        Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed bills this week expanding reproductive health care in Michigan
- 
                        The Michigan Senate voted this week to ban the sale of reproductive health data without gaining specific consent first
- 
                        Judge Sima Patel wrote an opinion that declared laws including 24-hour waiting periods and a ban on certain licensed professionals dispensing abortion drugs likely violate the reproductive rights amendment adopted by voters in 2022
- 
                        Abortion rights advocates say it’s the number one concern of voters. Pro-life supporters call that a scare tactic because the issue has already been decided in Michigan
- 
                        Whitmer says the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to toss a challenge to the abortion drug mifepristone is also important to upholding Michigan’s reproductive rights amendment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
