-
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers recently approved a permit for the Great Lakes Tunnel Project. Less than two weeks before that, the Michigan Supreme Court had ordered state regulators back to the drawing board when it came to permitting
-
The Michigan Supreme Court’s found state environmental law requires a broader look at the impact of the entire pipelineThis decision is separate from other legal fights to shut down the pipeline
-
Environmentalists and tribal leaders fear the planned tunnel construction would cause irreparable harm to its surroundings
-
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the case belongs in state court. It’s a win for the state and environmental groups that want to shut down Line 5
-
This is one of multiple cases in the courts on what should happen with Line 5
-
State of the Child event, GRPS grad rates, pedal pub, nursing pipeline, FAFSA assistance, two MI cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, and more
-
Michigan’s governor is appealing a federal decision to keep open an oil pipeline running between Lake Michigan and Lake Huron
-
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel argues Line 5 poses an unacceptable environmental risk to the Great Lakes
-
Enbridge argued the state couldn’t regulate Line 5 because the federal Pipeline Safety Act superseded any state policies
-
A U.S. District court judge is weighing whether the state of Michigan or the federal government has jurisdiction over a controversial pipeline that runs under the Straits of Mackinac