-
Hall said the Legislature will have to make deeper cuts this year that he would have preferred in the first place
-
-The House argued the court needed to step in to prevent the money from going out the door before the matter could be resolved-Most of the money in question might not be eligible for the House’s rejection
-
The revenue projections show a net $780 million revenue reduction for this fiscal year and $1.1 billion for the new one before revenue rebounds
-
A Michigan Court of Claims judge will hear arguments today on disputed spending in the state budget that legislative Republicans want stopped
-
Michigan House Republicans sued 16 state departments and challenged the legality of a formal opinion from Attorney General Dana Nessel
-
House Speaker Matt Hall said the lawsuit is necessary to rein in wasteful and unnecessary spending
-
The opinion clears the way for the state to continue spending on the programs that were cut last year by the House Appropriations Committee
-
Brinks says priorities for next year include passing a new state budget on time
-
The Michigan Public Policy Survey spoke to over 1,300 local governments across the state
-
Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids) said putting that money back was non-negotiable