-
Justices with the U.S. and Michigan supreme courts both decided against the measure Thursday
-
The Michigan Supreme Court will now decide whether a proposed state constitutional amendment to tighten the state’s voter ID laws belongs on the ballot
-
Michigan is one of roughly 30 states that allow some type of grace period for mail-in ballots that arrive after election day
-
The bills would allow individuals to file lawsuits challenging local actions that could make voting more difficult or confusing, especially for minorities.
-
The bills now go to the Senate floor, where Democratic leaders will decide when they will be put on the calendar for votes.
-
A state Senate committee is expected to vote Wednesday on legislation to create a Michigan Voting Rights Act
-
The state until recently kept a publicly available list of who voted in person on Election Day and who used an absentee ballot
-
A campaign to tighten Michigan’s voter ID laws submitted signatures Wednesday in hopes of getting a proposed constitutional amendment on the November ballot
-
The case arose after the Macomb County Clerk raised concerns about people refusing jury duty because they weren’t citizens
-
The ACLU would consider filing a lawsuit alleging a constitutional voting rights violation if the problem is not fixed