-
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the case belongs in state court. It’s a win for the state and environmental groups that want to shut down Line 5
-
The state lost in lower courts and the Supreme Court’s decision makes those decisions the final word on that question
-
This is one of multiple cases in the courts on what should happen with Line 5
-
Michigan’s governor is appealing a federal decision to keep open an oil pipeline running between Lake Michigan and Lake Huron
-
A U.S. District court judge is weighing whether the state of Michigan or the federal government has jurisdiction over a controversial pipeline that runs under the Straits of Mackinac
-
Enbridge has been trying to move the arguments to federal courts, where its chances are arguably better than state courts presided over by judges selected by Michigan voters
-
Enbridge wants a federal court to resolve the case without a trial. The nonprofit FLOW is among those opposing the company’s motion
-
The federal appellate court judges had remanded the case back to Michigan’s 30th Circuit Court in Ingham County. But Enbridge had requested a rehearing before the entire U.S. Court of Appeals
-
A legal battle over the future of Enbridge Energy’s Line Five gas and oil pipeline will continue in a state of Michigan court after Enbridge lost a federal court ruling Monday
-
Enbridge says the two companies combined have built nearly 400 miles of tunnel