-
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the case belongs in state court. It’s a win for the state and environmental groups that want to shut down Line 5
-
The state lost in lower courts and the Supreme Court’s decision makes those decisions the final word on that question
-
This is one of multiple cases in the courts on what should happen with Line 5
-
State of the Child event, GRPS grad rates, pedal pub, nursing pipeline, FAFSA assistance, two MI cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, and more
-
The U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals will decide where the cases belong. Governor Gretchen Whitmer and Attorney General Dana Nessel want state courts to be the venue. Enbridge thinks its prospects are better in federal courts
-
Michigan’s governor is appealing a federal decision to keep open an oil pipeline running between Lake Michigan and Lake Huron
-
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel argues Line 5 poses an unacceptable environmental risk to the Great Lakes
-
Enbridge argued the state couldn’t regulate Line 5 because the federal Pipeline Safety Act superseded any state policies
-
A U.S. District court judge is weighing whether the state of Michigan or the federal government has jurisdiction over a controversial pipeline that runs under the Straits of Mackinac
-
Two West Michigan lawmakers are going after child welfare issues, construction is under way on Grand Rapids' new soccer stadium, the Ottawa County Board of Commissioners voted not to pursue litigation against Consumers Energy, and more.