-
Nessel says the dismantling of various federal departments and agencies, like the Education Department, make it tough to track what happened to money destined for Michigan
-
-The House argued the court needed to step in to prevent the money from going out the door before the matter could be resolved-Most of the money in question might not be eligible for the House’s rejection
-
The revenue projections show a net $780 million revenue reduction for this fiscal year and $1.1 billion for the new one before revenue rebounds
-
A Michigan Court of Claims judge will hear arguments today on disputed spending in the state budget that legislative Republicans want stopped
-
Michigan House Republicans sued 16 state departments and challenged the legality of a formal opinion from Attorney General Dana Nessel
-
House Speaker Matt Hall said the lawsuit is necessary to rein in wasteful and unnecessary spending
-
The opinion clears the way for the state to continue spending on the programs that were cut last year by the House Appropriations Committee
-
The decision caused outrage and confusion among lawmakers and funding recipients who had been counting on those state funds
-
Money for the plan comes from redirecting taxes on gas sales, budget cuts, and a new wholesale tax on marijuana
-
In a video announcing the bill-signing, Whitmer made no mention of the consternation and presented a sunnier view of the situation