-
Michigan’s redistricting commission has been redrawing the boundaries to follow the lower court order while it awaited word from the high court
-
The commission has recently faced infighting. Further complicating things is a recent federal court decision requiring the commission to redraw over a dozen state House and Senate district lines
-
The suit alleges maps drawn by the Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission violate the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the federal Voting Rights Act
-
The redistricting commission says it’s conducting a legal review to decide whether Commissioner Anthony Eid’s new job is a conflict of interest
-
Michigan’s redistricting commission says it’s already spent around 430-thousand-dollars since running out of money in October
-
Michigan’s redistricting commission is suing the state legislature for a little over 3-million-dollars in funding
-
The suit will allege violations of the U.S. Voting Rights Act and the state constitution. The No. 1 map-drawing criteria for the panel was to comply with the 1965 law, which bans discriminatory voting practices and procedures.
-
Under the current map, Republicans would win an extra 15.2% of seats in a hypothetical tied election. Their edge drops to 2.8% under the new plan based on an analysis of 2016, 2018 and 2020 election data, according to PlanScore, a project of the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center. The GOP has controlled the chamber for nearly 40 years.
-
Her signature last week came days after the state Supreme Court ruled against the panel in a test of a constitutional requirement that it conduct all of its business at open meetings.
-
The Michigan Supreme Court on Friday denied a request to extend the deadline for drawing new legislative and congressional maps despite a delay in census…