95.3 / 88.5 FM Grand Rapids and 95.3 FM Muskegon
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
News

An attorney for Lyoya family says Patrick Lyoya’s criminal past is irrelevant

Ven Johnson.jpg
Ven Johnson Law
/
Near Perfect Media
Atty. Ven Johnson

Attorney Ven Johnson explains why traffic violations and a pending domestic violence warrant would have been unknown to the officer at the time of the traffic stop.

An attorney for the Lyoya family says Patrick Lyoya’s criminal past – including traffic violations and a pending domestic violence warrant - are irrelevant. Attorney Ven Johnson tells WGVU’s Patrick Center that history would have been unknown to the officer at the time of the traffic stop.

“What the relevant inquiry will be in a civil case is; what did this police officer know, and not know, about Patrick Lyoya? And at that time, this officer had no clue of what his criminal history was because he would have no ability to find that out.”

No clue explains Detroit-based attorney Ven Johnson because when Grand Rapids Police officer Christopher Schurr makes the April 4th traffic stop, he’s unable to match the car with the plate with the driver.

“This officer, Schurr, had no idea what Patrick’s criminal history was because he said nothing about it, of course nor should he have, as part of his initial traffic stop. What Schurr said is, ‘Hey, this license plate doesn’t match this car.’ That’s the quote.”

When officer Schurr made physical contact with Lyoya, the 26-year old Congolese man ran away. It led to a foot chase and a struggle over the officer’s taser. It ends with Schurr on top of Lyoya, who is face down, fatally shooting Lyoya in the back of the head?

Johnson admits Lyoya ran, but why he ran, no one will ever know.

“When you’re talking about an interaction with a police officer, obviously you’re looking at two people and what they said and what they did and what they knew and what they didn’t know. In this particular instance, since Patrick has been shot and killed, he can’t speak for himself. So, anything that anybody wants to ascribe to his motives for doing anything is complete and utter speculation.”

Related Content